From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1997
245 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 1, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of burglary in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of burglary in the second degree. The store in which the defendant committed the robbery was open to the public at the time of his entry. No evidence was presented to establish that the defendant defied a lawful order not to enter or remain. Thus, regardless of his intent, the defendant entered the store with license and privilege ( see, Penal Law § 140.00). Accordingly, we reverse the conviction of burglary in the second degree ( see, People v. Brown, 25 N.Y.2d 374, 376; see also, People v. Gaines, 74 N.Y.2d 358).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Lerner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1997
245 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Casey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC CASEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
667 N.Y.S.2d 374

Citing Cases

People v. Athanasatos

To establish accomplice liability for burglary in the third degree, the People must prove beyond a reasonable…