From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carromero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1997
244 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 6, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.).


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence that defendant had engaged in a heated argument with the decedent, returned shortly thereafter in a car with the assailant, pointed out the decedent to the assailant moments before the fatal shots, and drove the assailant away after the shooting was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find defendant shared the assailant's intent (People v. Rossey, 89 N.Y.2d 970, 972). The verdict was also not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility issues were properly placed before the jury and we find no basis on the record to disturb its determination. We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Carromero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1997
244 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Carromero

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE CARROMERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 154 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 574

Citing Cases

People v. Ennis

We reject Sheldon's claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of stabbing two rival…