From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carpus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1956
2 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Summary

In People v Carpus (2 A.D.2d 653) the court held, on an application for postconviction relief, that the "sentencing judge may appear and testify as a witness."

Summary of this case from Matter of Sheen

Opinion

May 25, 1956

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball and Bastow, JJ.


Order reversed and matter remitted to the Erie County Court for a hearing. Memorandum: The record before us does not conclusively refute the allegations of the petition and we think the appellant should have been afforded a hearing ( People v. Richetti, 302 N.Y. 290). The hearing should be had before a judge other than the sentencing judge. The sentencing judge may appear and testify as a witness. All concur.


Summaries of

People v. Carpus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 25, 1956
2 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

In People v Carpus (2 A.D.2d 653) the court held, on an application for postconviction relief, that the "sentencing judge may appear and testify as a witness."

Summary of this case from Matter of Sheen
Case details for

People v. Carpus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH CARPUS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 25, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
152 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

People v. Huarneck

The situation is quite different when the application is based on a claim that the petitioner's attorney told…

People v. Becvar

This follows even though the sentencing Judge is no longer sitting, or is disqualified. ( People v. Amoroso,…