Opinion
May 27, 1997
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Mogil, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was the driver of a vehicle with which he knowingly struck two pedestrians. The defendant fled from the scene, admittedly attempted to clean blood evidence off his vehicle, and removed the vehicle's license plates.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of tampering with physical evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the conviction of tampering with physical evidence was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Contrary to the defendant's contention, it could readily be contemplated under the circumstances of this case that the evidence he removed would be received as evidence at a prospective official proceeding (see, People v. Porpiglia, 215 A.D.2d 784; People v. DeRue, 179 A.D.2d 1027; People v. Nicholas, 70 A.D.2d 804).
Moreover, the verdict sheet that was submitted to the jury was proper. It contained no references to any of the statutory elements of manslaughter in the second degree, but merely instructed the jury not to consider the lesser-included offense of criminally negligent homicide unless the defendant was found not guilty of the charged offense (see, People v. Cole, 85 N.Y.2d 990; People v. Clark, 217 A.D.2d 555; People v. Vargas, 199 A.D.2d 291).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit (see, People v. Spann, 56 N.Y.2d 469).
Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.