From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cantu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 11, 1994

Appeal from the Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in accepting his guilty plea without a factual allocution. Because "defendant pleaded guilty to a lesser crime than the one charged in the indictment, a factual basis for the plea was unnecessary" (People v. Moore, 71 N.Y.2d 1002, 1006; People v. Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950, 951; People v. Nunez, 177 A.D.2d 656). Moreover, there is no basis to conclude that defendant's plea was "improvident or baseless" (People v. Duff, 158 A.D.2d 711, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 734). Defendant, no stranger to the criminal justice system, pleaded guilty only after he had consulted with counsel and had been fully advised by the court of the consequences of his plea (see, People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 350, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067; People v. O'Keefe, 170 A.D.2d 1020, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 965).

We also reject the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea. Whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered guilty plea is a decision that rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524-525; People v Hagzan, 155 A.D.2d 616, 617). Among the grounds supporting the exercise of that discretion are claims of innocence, fraud or mistake (People v. Cance, 155 A.D.2d 764, 764-765). After defendant pleaded guilty, he made a generalized assertion of innocence in a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. At the hearing on his motion, however, defendant stated that he wished to withdraw the guilty plea because he had discovered that his codefendant would not be testifying against him. That ground was insufficient. "[A] defendant is not entitled to withdraw his guilty plea merely because he discovers that he misapprehended the quality of the State's case" (People v. Lesesne, 173 A.D.2d 407). Further, the generalized assertion of innocence, unsupported by the record, was also insufficient to entitle defendant to withdraw his plea (see, People v. Chestnut, 188 A.D.2d 480, 481, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 883; People v. Salsman, 185 A.D.2d 469, 470, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 934; People v. O'Keefe, supra).


Summaries of

People v. Cantu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Cantu

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAVIER H. CANTU…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 133

Citing Cases

People v. Said

We conclude with respect to each appeal that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because the…

People v. Nicodemus

We disagree. Defendant moved to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he entered the plea under duress…