From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2006
35 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

December 5, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated March 29, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Before: Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly considered his 1991 violent felony conviction in calculating his risk level score under the Sex Offender Registration Act Assessment Guidelines and Commentary ( see People v Sinclair, 23 AD3d 537; People v Victor R., 186 Misc 2d 28, 35-36; Sex Offender Registration Act Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 14 [Nov. 1997]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2006
35 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GASPAR CAMACHO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2006

Citations

35 A.D.3d 424 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
824 N.Y.S.2d 719

Citing Cases

People v. Seals

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The People presented clear and convincing…

People v. Blaylock

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The appellant's contention that the…