From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. CADE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1988
145 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 19, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted, and upon reargument the original determination is adhered to for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Associate Justice Richard A. Brown, dated August 29, 1988.

We retain our view that the resubmission of this matter to the Grand Jury without the prior authorization of the court impaired the integrity of the proceedings before that body and created the possibility of prejudice to the defendant (see, CPL 210.35; People v Wilkins, 68 N.Y.2d 269, 276-277). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. CADE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1988
145 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. CADE

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MARK CADE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Del Toro

Thus, the People's resubmission without court authorization did not in any way jurisdictionally undermine the…

People v. Morales

In Wilkins the court considered the likelihood of prejudice to the defendant (supra, at 276). In adhering to…