From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cabrera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(IND. NO. 1028/97)

Argued January 9, 2001

August 27, 2001.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), dated March 18, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1) to set aside a jury verdict convicting him of possession of burglar's tools.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, Karen L. Ross, and Michael Tarbutton of counsel), for appellant.

Ronna Gordon-Galchus, Bayside, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for sentencing.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the evidence establishes that the defendant was twisting a screwdriver in the trunk lock of a stolen car, walked away when he saw the police, and discarded an object into a car which was later determined to be his vehicle. The object "clanged" when it struck another metal object in the vehicle, which contained a screwdriver, a hacksaw, and a hammer ( see, CPL 330.30; Penal Law § 145.35; People v. Borrero, 26 N.Y.2d 430). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The Supreme Court erred in setting aside the verdict of guilt in the interest of justice because such a motion should be brought prior to trial and on notice ( see, CPL 210.20). In any event, after a review of the facts and circumstances of this case, dismissal in the interest of justice is not warranted ( see, CPL 255.20; cf., People v. Colon, 86 N.Y.2d 861). Therefore, the order of the Supreme Court is reversed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for sentencing.

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, FEUERSTEIN and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cabrera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 27, 2001
286 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Cabrera

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., APPELLANT, v. CARLOS CABRERA, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 27, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 765

Citing Cases

People v. Morgan

In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60…