From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-03607

Submitted March 15, 2002.

April 22, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered April 5, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Jojo Annobil of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Michael Gore, and Marie-Claude P. Wrenn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was observed by the arresting police officer in what appeared to be a narcotics transaction. When the officer approached him, the defendant dropped a key box, which was later discovered to contain crack cocaine.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials. The defendant's contention that the arresting officer's testimony was incredible as a matter of law is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not specify this ground in his motion at the combined suppression hearing (see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, we find that the Supreme Court properly determined that the police officer had reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, thereby giving the officer the right to approach the defendant (see People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181; People v. Anderson, 185 A.D.2d 355; People v. Coleman, 183 A.D.2d 840), which ripened into probable cause to arrest once the officer observed the cocaine in the key box (see People v. Yizar, 196 A.D.2d 517; People v. Boone, 183 A.D.2d 721). In this regard, we note that the defendant abandoned the key box when he dropped it to the ground before he was stopped by the police (see People v. Clanton, 220 A.D.2d 764).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JOHNNIE BUTLER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 113

Citing Cases

People v. Wallace

ona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694), were spontaneous and were “not triggered by any police…

People v. Wallace

Here, the defendant's statements, although made before being informed of his Miranda rights (see Miranda v…