From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 2011
80 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2009-03276.

January 11, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), dated March 25, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Rosemari Y. Nam on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Roman JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation (see People v Bennis, 11 AD3d 896; People v Lynk, 74 AD3d 929, 929-930; People v Colavito, 73 AD3d 1004, 1005; People v Pearsall, 67 AD3d 876; People v Bowens, 55 AD3d 809, 810; People v Williams, 49 AD3d 518). Accordingly, the Supreme Court appropriately determined him to be a level three sex offender, and, after considering the mitigating factors advanced by the defendant, providently exercised its discretion in denying his request for a downward departure ( see People v Lynk, 74 AD3d at 929-930; People v Colavito, 73 AD3d at 1005; People v Ainoris, 57 AD3d 864, 865).


Summaries of

People v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 2011
80 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Burgess

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD BURGESS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2011

Citations

80 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 204
914 N.Y.S.2d 642

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There was clear and convincing evidence…

People of State v. Wyatt

In addition, the language in some of our cases goes a step further to suggest that, not only must the…