From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Buckhannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1985
108 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 11, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

The defendant's present challenge to the sufficiency of his allocution at the time he entered his pleas of guilty was not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). In any event, we find the plea allocutions to be satisfactory ( People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Moreover, the sentences imposed were lawful and appropriate and accordingly will not be disturbed ( People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Titone, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Buckhannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 11, 1985
108 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Buckhannon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LENSEY BUCKHANNON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

S.S.G. Inc. of New York v. 255 Long Beach Rd. Corp.

The Court is only aware of two trial court decisions applying Siegel to a mortgage foreclosure proceeding,…

People v. Valencia

Judgment, as amended, affirmed. By failing to make a motion to the court of first instance to withdraw his…