Opinion
November 16, 1995
Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.).
In full satisfaction of two indictments charging defendant with burglarizing two separate residences, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary in the second degree. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to two concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years in prison. Defendant argues that his guilty plea should be vacated because he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and that the sentence is harsh and excessive, Initially, we note that inasmuch as the record discloses that defendant made a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal, he may not challenge his guilty plea. In any event, were we to consider the merits, we would find that defendant was afforded meaningful representation and, therefore, was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Furthermore, given defendant's criminal history and the fact that the sentence imposed was in accordance with the plea agreement, we do not find that the sentence was harsh or excessive.
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.