Opinion
10-12-2017
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lamont BRUNSON, Defendant–Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Siobhan C. Atkins of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Megan DeMarco of counsel), for respondent.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Siobhan C. Atkins of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Megan DeMarco of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), entered on or about April 6, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly assessed points under the risk factor relating to defendant's relationship with a sex trafficking victim, because the evidence clearly established that defendant at least promoted the relationship for the purpose of such victimization, regardless of whether the victim had initiated conduct with defendant (see People v. Cook, 29 N.Y.3d 121, 126, 53 N.Y.S.3d 238, 75 N.E.3d 655 [2017] ). The court also properly assessed points under the risk factor for victimization of three or more persons, based upon clear and convincing evidence, contained in the case summary and the testifying victim's grand jury testimony (see People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 572–573, 883 N.Y.S.2d 154, 910 N.E.2d 983 [2009] ), that numerous women worked as prostitutes for defendant while under the threat of force.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the egregiousness of the underlying crime.
TOM, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, SINGH, MOULTON, JJ., concur.