From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1991
177 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 26, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.).


On an appeal from the denial of a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty, review is limited to whether there was an abuse of discretion (CPL 220.60; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524-525). There was no such abuse here. The plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered after defendant was given a glimpse of the strength of the case against him at an audibility hearing. In a thorough colloquy on the plea defendant acknowledged that he was giving up his rights to a jury trial, to call witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses, and to remain silent; he also acknowledged, in his own words, his complicity in the plot to kill another. Defendant mentioned that he was under "pressure", but in view of his acknowledgment that he was pleading guilty voluntarily, the trial court understood this to mean that "it's hard to make a decision" whether to plead guilty, and it was determined that counsel's advice to plead guilty and defendant's domestic circumstances did not impair defendant's ability to weigh alternatives. Clearly, defendant freely admitted his guilt and fully appreciated the nature of the proceedings and the consequences of his admissions. (See, People v. Lowrance, 41 N.Y.2d 303.)

Defendant's motion to controvert the warrant was properly denied. The informant's information was plainly based on personal knowledge (People v. Hanlon, 36 N.Y.2d 549). He was not only a participant in the conspiracy, but also was cooperating with the authorities, who made recordings of his conversations with defendant. This, and the fact that the informant had previously provided information leading to a murder indictment, established his reliability. Moreover, police surveillance provided meaningful confirmation of some of the details (People v Elwell, 50 N.Y.2d 231, 237). The court can hardly be said to have "blithely" accepted as true the matter contained in the affidavit (see, People v. Griminger, 71 N.Y.2d 635, 639-640).

Defense counsel's advice to defendant to plead guilty was not inconsistent with a legitimate strategy, and we reject defendant's contention that he was not provided effective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Strempack, 71 N.Y.2d 1015).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1991
177 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALLACE BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

People v. Safa

Defendant presents no persuasive facts to support the allegation, and the thorough colloquy conducted by the…

People v. Martin

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed and…