From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant correctly contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the individual who purchased drugs from him was his accomplice (see, CPL 60.22; People v Arnott, 143 A.D.2d 761, 763; People v Webster, 123 A.D.2d 488; People v Tune, 103 A.D.2d 990, 991-992). Inasmuch as defense counsel failed to object to the court's charge, that issue has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05). Because defendant's conviction did not rest substantially on the accomplice's testimony, we decline to consider this error as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15; cf., People v Strawder, 124 A.D.2d 758, 759).

The remaining contentions raised by defendant have not been preserved for appellate review and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH BROWN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 930

Citing Cases

People v. Mahan

Under the foregoing circumstances, a principle has been developed and been applied that there should be a…

People v. Gonzalez

Defendant contends that there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice…