From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
May 9, 2019
63 Misc. 3d 149 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2018-693 W CR

05-09-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tashon BROWN, Appellant.

John P. Savoca, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


John P. Savoca, for appellant.

Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: BRUCE E. TOLBERT, J.P., TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, JJ

ORDERED that the appeal is held in abeyance, the application by assigned counsel for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and new counsel is assigned pursuant to article 18-B of the County Law to prosecute the appeal;

Steven A. Feldman, Esq.

626 Reckson Plaza

West Tower, 6th Floor

Uniondale, NY 11556

New counsel is directed to serve and file a brief within 90 days after the date of this decision and order. The People may serve and file a respondent's brief within 21 days after the service upon them of the appellant's brief. Appellant's new counsel, if so advised, may serve and file a reply brief within seven days after service of the respondent's brief. Relieved counsel is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the newly assigned counsel.

Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), setting forth his conclusion that there exist no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal. An independent review of the record, however, reveals that a nonfrivolous issue exists as to whether the felony complaint pursuant to which defendant was initially charged was properly converted to a misdemeanor information so as to effectuate the reduction of the felony charge (see CPL 180.50 [3] [a] [iii] ). We therefore grant assigned counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel, and, in light of the risk inherent in the issue (see People v. Spooner , 22 Misc 3d 136[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52664[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2008] ), we assign new counsel to ascertain whether defendant desires to raise the issue set forth above, and to prosecute the appeal on defendant's behalf with respect to this issue or any other issue that can be identified.

TOLBERT, J.P., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
May 9, 2019
63 Misc. 3d 149 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tashon Brown…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: May 9, 2019

Citations

63 Misc. 3d 149 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 50733
115 N.Y.S.3d 595

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his guilty plea, of assault in the third degree (…