From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 28, 2018
158 A.D.3d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–09445 Ind. No. 15–00756

02-28-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carlton BROWN, appellant.

Gerald Zuckerman, Croton-on-Hudson, NY, for appellant. Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).


Gerald Zuckerman, Croton-on-Hudson, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTIONAppeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered July 28, 2016, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the motion of Gerald Zuckerman for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

ORDERED that Randall Richards, 1428 Midland Avenue, Suite 6, Bronxville, NY, 10708, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 24, 2017, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

In reviewing an attorney's motion to be relieved pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, this Court must first " ‘satisfy itself that the attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client's appeal’ " ( Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 255, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676, quoting Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 ). As this Court explained in Matter of Giovanni S., "counsel must, at a minimum, draw the Court's attention to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, applications, or motions; and identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority" ( Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 258, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).

Here, the brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, (386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 was deficient because it failed to analyze potential appellate issues with reference to relevant legal authority or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see People v. Randolph, 156 A.D.3d 818, 65 N.Y.S.3d 726 ; People v. Rivera, 142 A.D.3d 512, 35 N.Y.S.3d 722 ; People v. Parker, 135 A.D.3d 966, 968, 23 N.Y.S.3d 393 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel fulfilled his obligations under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v. Sedita, 113 A.D.3d 638, 640, 978 N.Y.S.2d 318 ; People v. McNair, 110 A.D.3d 742, 743, 971 N.Y.S.2d 889 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 258, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 28, 2018
158 A.D.3d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carlton BROWN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 28, 2018

Citations

158 A.D.3d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
68 N.Y.S.3d 889

Citing Cases

People v. Banks

If assigned counsel's Anders brief is deficient in this respect, "new counsel must be assigned to perform a…

People v. Banks

If assigned counsel's Anders brief is deficient in this respect, "new counsel must be assigned to perform a…