From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1997
242 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 29, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted as a steerer in the sale of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer ( see, People v. Herring, 83 N.Y.2d 780). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Thompson, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1997
242 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME BROWN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 926

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Miller

We have found a claim "adjudicated on the merits," triggering the AEDPA standard of review, where the claim…

Brown v. Artuz

On September 29, 1997, a four-judge panel unanimously affirmed Brown's conviction in a short published…