From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 27, 1998
252 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 380.30. The delay in sentencing the defendant was excusable because it was the result of his own conduct in providing law enforcement officials with aliases and other false information (see, People v. Drake, 61 N.Y.2d 359, 366).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed on the defendant was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 27, 1998
252 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT BROWN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 27, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 308

Citing Cases

People v. Washington

That motion was denied after a hearing, on the ground that "the defendant actively engaged in conduct (i.e.…

People v. Rodriguez

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. We reject the defendant's contention that there was an unreasonable…