From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 30, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wisner, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., PINE, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Memorandum:

Contrary to the contention of defendant, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of the recross-examination of the police officer who observed defendant engaged in what appeared to be a drug transaction. Defendant had a full opportunity to cross-examine the officer with respect to his observations, and it was within the sound discretion of the court to prohibit questions seeking to ascertain why the other participant in the transaction was not arrested ( see, People v. Snell, 234 A.D.2d 986, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1015). The proper exercise of the court's discretion "in determining the extent of the cross-examination * * * should not be disturbed" ( People v. Greer, 42 N.Y.2d 170, 176).


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VERNON BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 916

Citing Cases

People v. Torrance

ses and therefore lacked standing to challenge the warrantless entries and searches ( see People v. Williams,…

People v. Simmons

We reject defendant's contention that the court's "improper conduct" deprived defendant of his right to a…