Opinion
2012–02839 Ind. No. 11256/08
10-17-2018
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Clifton BRODERICK, appellant.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.
Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed February 28, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Although the defendant has served his sentence, the question of whether the sentence imposed should be reduced is not academic, because the sentence imposed has potential immigration consequences (see People v. Ayala , 142 A.D.3d 1095, 1095, 37 N.Y.S.3d 712 ; People v. Aisewomhonio, 131 A.D.3d 1177, 1178, 16 N.Y.S.3d 764 ). Considering all the relevant circumstances of this case, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.