Opinion
December 8, 1997
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in allowing the seven-year-old complainant to testify as a sworn witness, as she had "`some conception' of the obligations of an oath and the consequences of giving false testimony" (People v. Parks, 41 N.Y.2d 36, 46, quoting People v. Washor, 196 N.Y. 104, 109). Although she gave perfunctory answers to the court's sometimes leading questions, her testimony, as a whole, demonstrated that she understood she had a moral duty to tell the truth (see, People v. Maldonado, 199 A.D.2d 563; People v. Ranum, 122 A.D.2d 959; People v. Cintron, 214 A.D.2d 349). She knew the difference between the truth and a lie, knew that she would be punished if she did not tell the truth, and stated that she would tell the truth in court.
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.