From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Breazil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1986
120 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

May 12, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's right to counsel claim. Further, the alleged error in the court's accomplice charge is unpreserved for appellate review, there having been no objection registered in respect thereto at trial (see, CPL 470.05; People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818). Finally, the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive under the circumstances of this case and in light of the defendant's prior criminal involvement. Eiber, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Breazil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1986
120 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Breazil

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TERRANCE BREAZIL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1986

Citations

120 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Turner

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not…

People v. Rogers

In any event, we find that the verdict was not repugnant because there was ample evidence to support the…