From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Braxton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1995
214 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 25, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.).


The hearing court's findings of fact crediting the police officer's testimony that he observed defendant from a distance of approximately 25 feet drop a handgun on the sidewalk are entitled to much weight (People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761), and will not be disturbed by this Court. The officer's observations provided cause for defendant's arrest.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), we find that defendant's guilt of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by legally sufficient evidence, and upon an independent review of the facts, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). The issues raised by defendant concerning the credibility of the police officers were properly placed before the fact finder, and we find no reason to disturb its determination.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Braxton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1995
214 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Braxton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD BRAXTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 228

Citing Cases

People v. Sanchez

As Detective Brown looked in the bag, discovering cocaine, the other officer, to whom this information was…

People v. Anderson

There is no merit to the defendant's claim that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus…