Opinion
December 18, 1987
Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.
Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: While being transported in a prison bus from one correctional facility to another, defendant and five other inmates attacked the correctional guards, seized a weapon and handcuffed the bus driver and guards. Defendant attempted to drive the bus but it stalled. Before he could start the bus, defendant observed a State Police vehicle approach, and he and three others fled on foot. The four forcibly obtained car keys from a resident of a nearby motel and drove off in her blue Maverick automobile. Within minutes, police spotted the vehicle and gave chase. The car stopped to allow the passengers, including defendant, to exit and then sped away. The three inmates were apprehended in the woods nearby and the driver was apprehended after the vehicle struck a guardrail.
We reject defendant's claim that the People failed to prove that the crimes committed on the bus occurred within Oneida County. A correctional officer testified that before the struggle ended the bus was stopped on the State Thruway about one-half mile inside Oneida County. The issue was properly submitted to the jury (see, Matter of Machado v Donalty, 107 A.D.2d 1079) and the verdict is supported by the evidence.
The prison bus constituted a detention facility within the meaning of Penal Law § 205.00 (see, People v Blank, 87 A.D.2d 947; see also, People v Walter, 115 A.D.2d 52, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 952), and the jury verdict on the escape charge was not contrary to the weight of evidence.
We also conclude that defendant's conduct in starting the bus and attempting to move it and his conduct of riding in the car with intent to flee from commission of a felony each constituted the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in violation of section 165.08 Penal of the Penal Law.
Defendant's remaining claims lack merit, and our review of the trial record indicates that the jury verdict was not contrary to the weight of evidence.