From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brann

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Apr 2, 2021
193 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2021–01765

04-02-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., EX REL. Marion E. CAMPBELL, on behalf of Driton Kadriu, petitioner, v. Cynthia BRANN, etc., respondent.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Marion E. Campbell pro se of counsel), for petitioner. Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Jacqueline Bruno of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Marion E. Campbell pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Jacqueline Bruno of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Driton Kadriu upon his own recognizance pursuant to CPL 30.30(2)(a) or, in the alternative, for bail reduction, upon Richmond County Indictment No. 121/2020.

ADJUDGED that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, to set reasonable bail or to release Driton Kadriu on his own recognizance, and to fix such other terms and conditions upon the release of Driton Kadriu as may seem to it to be just and proper.

Contrary to the respondent's contention, under the circumstances of this case, the COVID–19 pandemic does not qualify as exceptional circumstances under CPL 30.30(4)(g). Since more than 90 days of delay in bringing Driton Kadriu to trial on Richmond County Indictment No. 121/2020 are chargeable to the prosecution, CPL 30.30(2)(a) commands that he be released on bail, which he is capable of meeting, or upon his own recognizance (see People ex rel. Chakwin v. Warden, N.Y. City Correctional Facility, Rikers Is., 63 N.Y.2d 120, 480 N.Y.S.2d 719, 470 N.E.2d 146 ).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brann

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Apr 2, 2021
193 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Brann

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Marion E. Campbell, on behalf…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Apr 2, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
193 A.D.3d 669
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2090

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Nieves v. Molina

Here, the 13 days chargeable to the People due to their unexplained delay in responding to the omnibus…

People ex rel. Ferro v. Brann

Thus, the People are chargeable with the time between the court-imposed deadline to respond to the omnibus…