From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brandon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 23, 1995
213 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 23, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of Albany County (Keegan, J.).


In our view, defendant, having failed to move to withdraw his plea or vacate his judgment of conviction, has not preserved for appeal his challenge to the validity or sufficiency of the plea allocution. In any event, our examination of the record reveals that defendant's plea of guilty and his waiver of his right to appeal were not coerced and were instead knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. Moreover, we find that defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel was not violated at any stage of these proceedings. The remaining arguments raised by defendant have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Brandon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 23, 1995
213 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Brandon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY W. BRANDON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 976

Citing Cases

People v. Molini

Defendant challenges the adequacy of his plea allocution contending that it was not intelligently and…