Opinion
2016–01064 Ind. No. 14–00199
01-17-2018
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Brendon BORIA, appellant.
Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger and Carrie A. Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.
Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.
Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger and Carrie A. Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, ROBERT J. MILLER, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Rolf Thorsen, J.), rendered December 15, 2015, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court, and generally the court's determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see CPL 220.60[3] ; People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802 ; People v. Street, 144 A.D.3d 711, 711–712, 39 N.Y.S.3d 824 ; People v. Rodriguez, 142 A.D.3d 1189, 1190, 38 N.Y.S.3d 224 ). "Generally, a plea of guilty may not be withdrawn absent some evidence of innocence, fraud, or mistake in its inducement" ( People v. Smith, 54 A.D.3d 879, 880, 863 N.Y.S.2d 818 ; see People v. Rodriguez, 142 A.D.3d at 1190, 38 N.Y.S.3d 224 ; People v. Zakrzewski, 7 A.D.3d 881, 881, 776 N.Y.S.2d 377 ). When a defendant moves to withdraw a plea of guilty, the nature and extent of the fact-finding inquiry rests largely in the discretion of the court, and a hearing will be granted only in rare instances (see People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 365 N.Y.S.2d 161, 324 N.E.2d 544 ; People v. Street, 144 A.D.3d at 712, 39 N.Y.S.3d 824 ). Here, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v. Seeber, 4 N.Y.3d 780, 780, 793 N.Y.S.2d 826, 826 N.E.2d 797 ). The defendant's claim that his attorney coerced him to plead guilty is belied by his statements under oath acknowledging that he was voluntarily pleading guilty, that he was satisfied with his attorney's representation, and that no one had made any threats or forced him to enter his plea (see People v. Dazzo, 92 A.D.3d 796, 796–797, 938 N.Y.S.2d 446 ; People v. Caruso, 88 A.D.3d 809, 810, 930 N.Y.S.2d 668 ; People v. Jackson, 87 A.D.3d 552, 553, 928 N.Y.S.2d 58 ; People v. Douglas, 83 A.D.3d 1092, 1092–1093, 921 N.Y.S.2d 324 ).
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to the extent that the claim does not directly involve the plea negotiation (see People v. Dunne, 106 A.D.3d 928, 928, 964 N.Y.S.2d 663 ; see also People v. Petgen, 55 N.Y.2d 529, 534, 450 N.Y.S.2d 299, 435 N.E.2d 669 ; People v. Turner, 40 A.D.3d 1018, 1019, 834 N.Y.S.2d 666 ). To the extent that the defendant contends that ineffective assistance of counsel affected the voluntariness of his plea, the record demonstrates that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Cobb, 19 A.D.3d 506, 798 N.Y.S.2d 477 ; see also People v. Dazzo, 92 A.D.3d 796, 796–797, 938 N.Y.S.2d 446 ).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.