From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. BORG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 22, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Putnam County (Bowers, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The hearing court properly determined that defendant and his wife had voluntarily consented to the searches ( see, People v Gonzalez, 39 N.Y.2d 122) and that defendant's statement to Investigator McKnight after defendant had invoked his right to counsel was admissible as a spontaneous statement ( see, People v Rogers, 48 N.Y.2d 167). We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. BORG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. BORG

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN E. BORG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Visich

Here, the record supports the hearing court's determination to credit the testimony of the police witnesses,…