From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Boomer

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 12, 1980
297 N.W.2d 663 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

Docket No. 45869.

Decided August 12, 1980.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, L. Brooks Patterson, Prosecuting Attorney, Robert C. Williams, Chief Appellate Counsel, and Thomas S. Richards, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Young Kaluzny, for defendant on appeal.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and BASHARA, JJ.


Defendant appeals of right his May 15, 1979, plea of guilty to armed robbery. MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797. On May 16, 1979, he was sentenced to a term of 8 to 20 years imprisonment. Defendant raises one issue for our consideration. On the date of sentencing, but before sentence was imposed by the Court, defendant indicated that he wished to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant's request was summarily denied without any inquiry by the sentencing judge as to why defendant wished to withdraw his plea:

"Defendant: I would like to withdraw my plea to not guilty (sic).

"The Court: Your motion is denied. Anything further?

"Defendant: No."

Although there is no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea, requests for withdrawal should be granted with "great liberality" if made prior to sentencing. People v Price, 85 Mich. App. 57; 270 N.W.2d 707 (1978), lv den 405 Mich. 819 (1979), People v Winegar, 78 Mich. App. 764; 261 N.W.2d 45 (1977).

In People v Moore, 74 Mich. App. 195, 198; 253 N.W.2d 708 (1977), this Court held that when a defendant moves to withdraw a guilty plea, the judge must "inquire in some detail why the defendant wishes to do so". We find no evidence of such an inquiry in the instant case. Therefore, we would adopt the remedy approved of in Moore and remand this case to the lower court with instruction to conduct an evidentiary hearing on whether defendant's desire to withdraw his guilty plea was motivated by a sufficiently nonfrivolous reason. If, in the discretion of the trial judge, it was, the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea and should be tried on the original charge in accordance with People v Moore, supra. If, on the other hand, the trial judge should determine that the defendant has no valid reason for withdrawing his guilty plea, the conviction should be affirmed. We retain no further jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Boomer

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 12, 1980
297 N.W.2d 663 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Boomer

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v BOOMER

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 12, 1980

Citations

297 N.W.2d 663 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980)
297 N.W.2d 663

Citing Cases

People v. Sylvester

" See also People v Boomer, 99 Mich. App. 353; 297 N.W.2d 663 (1980). In Bentley, the court found valid the…