affirming judgment where court told the jury the defendant "did something" to be in court, and used a gas station analogy to explain how to determine if defendant broke the law
Summary of this case from People v. TibbelsCourt of Appeals No. 09CA0462
03-01-2012
The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Francisco Bonilla-Barrera, Defendant-Appellant.
Adams County District Court No. 07CR3893
Honorable Francis C. Wasserman, Judge
affirming judgment where court told the jury the defendant "did something" to be in court, and used a gas station analogy to explain how to determine if defendant broke the law
Summary of this case from People v. TibbelsFull title:The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio…
Court:Colorado Court of Appeals
Date published: Mar 1, 2012
19. People v. Bonilla-Barrera , 2012 WL 680867 (Colo. App. No. 09CA0462, Mar. 1, 2012) (not published…
People v. Estes¶ 8 Apparently, the trial court used this explanation in criminal jury trials as a matter of course, and,…