From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1994
200 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 6, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.).


The child victim's statement to her sister one day after the incident was properly admitted as a "prompt outcry", under the circumstances, including the child's age and fear of defendant, who resided in her home (People v. McDaniel, 81 N.Y.2d 10, 17). While the child's later statement to her mother should not have been admitted as a prompt outcry, there is no significant probability that this evidence, or any of the questions to which objections were sustained, influenced the verdict in this nonjury trial (People v. D'Abate, 37 N.Y.2d 922, 923-924).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 1994
200 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Bonilla

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN BONILLA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 201

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by questions briefly mentioning his pretrial silence, which were…

People v. Evangelista

According to the victim, the abuse occurred around the time of her seventh birthday. Under all of the…