From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Blunt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2017
149 A.D.3d 1573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-28-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Durell BLUNT, Defendant–Appellant.

Norman P. Effman, Public Defender, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Donald G. O'Geen, District Attorney, Warsaw (Eric R. Schiener of Counsel), For Respondent.


Norman P. Effman, Public Defender, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

Donald G. O'Geen, District Attorney, Warsaw (Eric R. Schiener of Counsel), For Respondent.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, DeJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25 [2] ). Contrary to defendant's contention, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction (see People v. Mansilla, 143 A.D.3d 1263, 1263, 38 N.Y.S.3d 494 ; People v. Davey, 134 A.D.3d 1448, 1449, 22 N.Y.S.3d 713 ). Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932 ), the evidence provided a "valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence at trial" (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ), i.e., that defendant possessed a flat, sharpened piece of metal that he wielded during a prison fight. Moreover, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Hood, 145 A.D.3d 1565, 1565–1566, 43 N.Y.S.3d 834 ; Mansilla, 143 A.D.3d at 1263, 38 N.Y.S.3d 494 ; see generally Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d at 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). We have considered defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence and conclude that it is without merit.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Blunt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2017
149 A.D.3d 1573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Blunt

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Durell BLUNT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 28, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 1573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
149 A.D.3d 1573

Citing Cases

People v. Killings

Although no weapon was recovered, the evidence further established that the other inmate sustained a cut to…