From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Blunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 1990
162 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 11, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court's finding that a valid predicate existed for the police to stop the defendant and ask for his identification (CPL 140.50; People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223). Once the defendant voluntarily identified himself as Herman Blunt, the police had probable cause to arrest him, since Blunt had been previously identified by a named citizen as having committed a burglary (see, People v. Inman, 80 A.D.2d 622). Kunzeman, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Blunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 1990
162 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Blunt

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HERMAN BLUNT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
556 N.Y.S.2d 739

Citing Cases

People v. Greene

We find that Dibble had reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant had committed a crime given the…

People v. Bingham

We disagree. As a general rule, information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of…