From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Blount

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 21, 1999

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered February 11, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.


Defendant intentionally aided his codefendant's sale of heroin to an undercover police officer by loaning the codefendant his bicycle for the purpose of retrieving the drugs and by insisting that the undercover officer sample the drugs immediately after the sale (see, People v. Kaplan, 76 N.Y.2d 140) There was ample evidence to support the jury's finding that defendant was not a bystander but an active participant in a drug transaction. Accordingly, the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence.

Defendant's request for a circumstantial evidence charge was properly denied. Defendant's guilt was established through direct evidence of conduct from which the inference of accessorial liability could be drawn (see, People v. Roldan, 88 N.Y.2d 826).

SULLIVAN, J.P., NARDELLI, TOM, MAZZARELLI, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Blount

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Blount

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EUGENE BLOUNT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 15

Citing Cases

People v. Reynolds

Evidence of defendant's guilt was not purely circumstantial ( see, People v. Daddona, 81 N.Y.2d 990, 992;…