In Black v. Woodrow, 39 Md. 194, this Court held that an instrument subject to the Act of 1866 was not void or inadmissible in evidence, if the omission to stamp it was without intent to evade the provisions of the Act.
Summary of this case from Wingert v. ZeiglerDecided October 21, 1980
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
In Black v. Woodrow, 39 Md. 194, this Court held that an instrument subject to the Act of 1866 was not void or inadmissible in evidence, if the omission to stamp it was without intent to evade the provisions of the Act.
Summary of this case from Wingert v. ZeiglerFull title:PEOPLE v. BLACK (WOODROW)
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 21, 1980
And thus there is no necessity for a further action on the quantum meruit for the recovery for those…
Wyles v. CampbellA formal and written employment contract signed by both parties and contemplating, by both, employment for a…