From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Biggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 1994
203 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. Viewing counsel's performance "in its entirety, in conjunction with the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case" (People v Vanterpool, 143 A.D.2d 282; see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147), we are satisfied that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel.

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Biggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 1994
203 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Biggs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL BIGGS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 895