From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bethea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 2004
12 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-10075.

November 8, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered October 23, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Despite the defendant's contention to the contrary, he was not deprived of his right to testify before the grand jury as a result of the prosecutor's interruptions during his grand jury appearance, since the prosecutor simply prevented him from testifying on a variety of topics that were not relevant to the facts of this case or the grand jury's investigation ( see People v. Smith, 199 AD2d 348, affd 84 NY2d 998; People v. Valvano, 186 AD2d 769).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Bethea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 2004
12 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Bethea

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES BETHEA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 853

Citing Cases

People v. Meleance

In any event, upon our examination of the relevant portions of the grand jury minutes, we find that there…

People v. Adamson

In his pro se supplemental brief, the defendant contends that the prosecutor improperly interrupted him…