From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Berrus

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 2003
1 N.Y.3d 535 (N.Y. 2003)

Opinion

144.

Decided November 25, 2003.

John A. Cirando, for appellant.

Samuel C. Young, for respondent.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of County Court should be reversed and the simplified traffic information reinstated.

Defendant received a simplified traffic information for failing to have lights on the back of a tractor that was pulling a manure spreader, around 5 p.m. in the Town of Denmark, County of Lewis, on December 5, 2001. Relying upon advice from the Court Administration Resource Center, the Town Justice concluded, erroneously, that lights were not required because a tractor is not a motor vehicle within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 375 and 376. The Town Justice dismissed the action in the interest of justice, and County Court affirmed.

In dismissing the case, the Town Justice referred to a provision of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 376 that was repealed by Laws of 1994, Chapter 654, § 5, effective January 29, 1995, — a provision referring to registered farm vehicles and requiring them to be equipped in accordance with regulations issued by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles. By contrast, section 376(1)(a) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which was in effect on the date the ticket was issued, requires lights on vehicles and thus includes tractors.

Moreover, when an action is dismissed in the interest of justice pursuant to CPL 170.40, the Judge must consider, "individually and collectively," the specific factors listed and must state reasons on the record (see also CPL 210.40). While dismissal may have been warranted, the record does not indicate that the Town Justice took into consideration the factors enumerated in CPL 170.40. We, therefore, reverse the order of County Court and reinstate the simplified traffic information.

Order reversed and simplified traffic information reinstated, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Berrus

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 2003
1 N.Y.3d 535 (N.Y. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Berrus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE C., Appellant, v. PAUL M. BERRUS, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 25, 2003

Citations

1 N.Y.3d 535 (N.Y. 2003)
770 N.Y.S.2d 691
802 N.E.2d 1089

Citing Cases

People v. Epakchi

A local criminal court, in considering a motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument in the interest of…

People v. Epakchi

A local criminal court, in considering a motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument in the interest of…