From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Berrios

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 21, 1988
523 N.E.2d 824 (N.Y. 1988)

Opinion

Argued March 18, 1988

Decided April 21, 1988

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Elbert Hinkson, J.

John J. Halloran, Jr., for appellant.

Paul Gentile, District Attorney (Andrea M. DiGregorio and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed. Defendant's primary argument on this appeal, that evidence of a prior assault on the victim was not admissible to negate the anticipated defense of accident, was not raised in the trial court and therefore is not preserved for our review. Defendant's remaining contentions, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, are without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Berrios

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 21, 1988
523 N.E.2d 824 (N.Y. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Berrios

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JORGE BERRIOS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 21, 1988

Citations

523 N.E.2d 824 (N.Y. 1988)
523 N.E.2d 824
528 N.Y.S.2d 537

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

The weight of the credible evidence presented, particularly the testimony of the undercover officer, reveals…

People v. Taylor

However, neither the jury nor the defendant asked the court to recharge the justification defense and the…