From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Benson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1996
232 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 15, 1996.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), imposed February 14, 1995, as, upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, imposed a mandatory surcharge.

Before: Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ.


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The defendant challenged the court's refusal to waive the mandatory surcharge imposed as a condition of his sentence. It is well settled that such challenges are premature at the time of sentencing, since the defendant may earn funds while incarcerated from which to pay the surcharge, or upon completion of the sentence the defendant may move to vacate the surcharge upon a showing of indigency ( see, People v Velez, 216 AD2d 339; People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622).


Summaries of

People v. Benson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1996
232 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Benson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD BENSON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 943

Citing Cases

People v. Hopkins

The policy considerations underlying such a conclusion are supported to some extent by case law. Prior to the…

People v. Hopkins

The policy considerations underlying such a conclusion are supported to some extent by case law. Prior to the…