From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bennett

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 20, 2016
135 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2011-03937 Ind. No. 09-00395.

01-20-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Donald BENNETT, appellant.

Jason M. Bernheimer, Katonah, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.


Jason M. Bernheimer, Katonah, N.Y., for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered June 23, 2011, convicting him attempted burglary in the second degree and burglary in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the motion of Jason M. Bernheimer for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

ORDERED that Arza R. Feldman, Esq., 626 RXR Plaza, West Tower, 6th Floor, Uniondale, NY, 11556, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 6, 2014, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 is deficient because it fails to analyze potential appellate issues and fails to highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see People v. Emrich, 114 A.D.3d 872, 873, 980 N.Y.S.2d 802; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel has fulfilled his obligations under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v. Emrich, 114 A.D.3d at 873, 980 N.Y.S.2d 802; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676).


Summaries of

People v. Bennett

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 20, 2016
135 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Donald BENNETT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 20, 2016

Citations

135 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
23 N.Y.S.3d 380
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 372

Citing Cases

People v. Cooper

By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 1, 2013, the appellant was granted leave to…

People v. Cooper

By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 1, 2013, the appellant was granted leave to…