From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Benjamin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2003
2 A.D.3d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06592.

December 22, 2003.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered July 11, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), assault in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Latella, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Robert DiDio, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Ushir Pandit of counsel), for respondent.

Before: HOWARD MILLER and SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The showup in the present case was confirmatory ( see People v. Bazelias, 220 A.D.2d 443; People v. Hewitt, 267 A.D.2d 326; People v. Martindale, 202 A.D.2d 158). Approximately one month after the robbery, a witness saw the defendant on the street. This identification occurred spontaneously without any police involvement. The witness immediately described both the defendant and his vehicle to the police, who then found the defendant in the vehicle less than 30 minutes later, a short distance away. The confirmatory showup which followed merely assured that the person being detained was in fact the person whom the witness had just identified. Accordingly, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony was properly denied.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SMITH, J.P., LUCIANO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Benjamin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 2003
2 A.D.3d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Benjamin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. IVAN BENJAMIN, A/K/A IRVIN BENJAMIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 659

Citing Cases

People v. Romero

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The hearing court properly denied suppression of the complainant's…

People v. Romero

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The hearing court properly denied suppression of the complainant's…