Opinion
403 KA 22-00378
05-05-2023
NORMAN P. EFFMAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, WARSAW (FARES A. RUMI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DONALD G. O'GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
NORMAN P. EFFMAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, WARSAW (FARES A. RUMI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DONALD G. O'GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND OGDEN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree ( Penal Law §§ 110.00, 265.03 [3] ). Although the record establishes that defendant validly waived his right to appeal (see generally People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565-566, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ), defendant's challenge to the constitutionality of Penal Law § 265.03 in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen , ––– U.S. ––––, 142 S.Ct. 2111, 213 L.Ed.2d 387 (2022) is not barred by the waiver inasmuch as that challenge relates to "a right of constitutional dimension going to ‘the very heart of the process’ " ( People v. Lopez , 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ). Because defendant failed to raise any such challenge in County Court, however, it is not preserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2] ; People v. Jacque-Crews , 213 A.D.3d 1335, 1335-1336, 183 N.Y.S.3d 234 [4th Dept. 2023], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1111, 186 N.Y.S.3d 841, 208 N.E.3d 69 [2023] ; see generally People v. Reese , 206 A.D.3d 1461, 1462-1463, 170 N.Y.S.3d 375 [3d Dept. 2022] ), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c] ).