From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 4, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court properly determined that the People were ready for trial within six months of the filing of the felony complaint (see, CPL 1.20; 30.30 [1] [a]; [4] [b], [f], [g]).

The defendant's presence at the Ventimiglia conference would have been superfluous because the outcome was wholly favorable to the defendant (see, People v Favor, 82 N.Y.2d 254, 267; People v Ventimiglia, 52 N.Y.2d 350; People v Daniel, 206 A.D.2d 856, 857; cf., People v Spotford, 85 N.Y.2d 593, 597).

Based upon our review of the record, we find that the defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147; see also, People v Brewer, 194 A.D.2d 733, 734; People v Sullivan, 153 A.D.2d 223, 229-231; People v Thompson, 211 A.D.2d 651; People v Frascatore, 200 A.D.2d 860, 861).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Mangano, P.J., Balletta, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Baum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Baum

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE BAUM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

People v. Slaughter

The Supreme Court ruled that the witness could not testify that he had observed the defendant selling drugs,…

People v. Correa

We therefore vacate the defendant's sentence and remit the matter to the Supreme Court so that the defendant…