From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Battle

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 13, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

571060/15

03-13-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, v. Carlton BATTLE, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered October 14, 2015, affirmed.

The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (see Penal Law § 220.03 ), and set forth sufficient factual allegations to show the basis for the arresting officer's conclusion that the substance at issue was a controlled substance. The instrument recited that police "took cocaine from inside the brim of the defendant's hat" and that the officer knew the substance was cocaine "based upon [his] professional training as a police officer in the identification of drugs, [his] prior experience as a police officer making drug arrests, and observation of the packaging, which is characteristic of this type of drug" (see People v. Smalls , 26 NY3d 1064 [2015] ; People v. Kalin , 12 NY3d 225, 231-232 [2009] ; People v. Pearson , 78 AD3d 445 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 799 [2011] ).


Summaries of

People v. Battle

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Mar 13, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Battle

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, v. Carlton Battle…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Mar 13, 2019

Citations

62 Misc. 3d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 50296
113 N.Y.S.3d 812

Citing Cases

People v. Neischer

Here, no facts were stated as to the physical characteristics of the substance alleged to be a cocaine…

People v. Garcia

The information also set forth sufficient factual allegations to show the basis for the arresting officer's…