From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Batista

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 9, 2015
130 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

4230/07, 15690A, 3650/08, 15690

07-09-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan BATISTA, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alice Wiseman of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alice Wiseman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered October 29, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to concurrent terms of 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

For the reasons stated in People v. Tate, 130 A.D.3d 505, 14 N.Y.S.3d 332, 2015 WL 4112538 (1st Dept.2015), (decided simultaneously herewith), we find that defendant failed to preserve his claim that the court was required to provide the public with notice of an impending hearing on the closure of the courtroom during an undercover officer's testimony, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice, and we also find that defendant lacks standing to assert such a claim.

We find no violation of defendant's right to a public trial. The court providently exercised its discretion in ruling that the relatives identified by defendant should be excluded from the courtroom based on their residence in or near areas in which the testifying undercover officers were conducting ongoing investigations (see People v. Campbell, 16 N.Y.3d 756, 919 N.Y.S.2d 109, 944 N.E.2d 645 [2011] ; People v. Alvarez, 51 A.D.3d 167, 175, 854 N.Y.S.2d 70 [1st Dept.2008], lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 785, 866 N.Y.S.2d 611, 896 N.E.2d 97 [2008] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, SAXE, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Batista

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 9, 2015
130 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Batista

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Batista…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 9, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6037
11 N.Y.S.3d 858

Citing Cases

People v. Batista

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 130 AD3d 503 (NY)…

Batista v. Gonyea

The First Department held that Petitioner failed to preserve his claim that the court was required to provide…