From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1992
180 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 25, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda S. Soloff, J.).


Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel because his attorney's law firm also represented the codefendant. Although the court should have conducted an inquiry on the record prior to accepting defendant's guilty plea to ascertain whether he was aware of the possibility that a conflict existed by virtue of the joint representation (People v. Recupero, 73 N.Y.2d 877, 878-879), defendant has failed to demonstrate that "a significant possibility of a conflict of interest existed bearing a substantial relationship to the conduct of the defense" (supra, at 879), and nothing in the record suggests "that the potential for conflict actually operated", or "that the plea was induced by any consideration other than [defendant's] own best interests" (supra, at 879).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Barber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 1992
180 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Barber

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD BARBER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 274

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

entation of alleged suspects in this case or potential witnesses affected the presentation of his case during…

Frazier v. Kelly

Conjecture over what Latona might have testified to at trial simply does not meet the standard established by…