From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1998
247 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not warrant reversal.

Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 1998
247 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Bannon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PATRICK BANNON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 489

Citing Cases

Rudenko v. Costello

Then it said, "The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not…