From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Baldares-Lima

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2006
29 A.D.3d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-09072.

May 16, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 29, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

Michele Marte-Indzonka, Newburgh, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Daniel M. Reback of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of his conviction is without merit ( see People v. McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114; People v. Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404; People v. Sandher, 12 AD3d 464, 465).


Summaries of

People v. Baldares-Lima

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2006
29 A.D.3d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Baldares-Lima

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIEGO BALDARES-LIMA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3911
813 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

People v. Grant

Ordered that the order is affirmed. The alleged failure of the defendant's trial counsel to advise the…

People v. Artusa

Failure of counsel to warn Defendant of possible or even certain immigration consequences of his plea did not…